How Love on the Spectrum fails to represent queer stories

Pari and Tina standing together in front of a rainbow

The docu-reality series “Love on the Spectrum” is beloved for its portrayal of individuals on the Autism spectrum as they navigate dating and relationships, but it has work to do with its representation of queer relationships. 

Both the Australian series, which began in 2019, and the ongoing U.S. adaptation, feature around 6 to 9 participants each season, but only a few have ever been openly queer.

This lack of representation has drawn criticism from fans, who point out that individuals on the Autism spectrum are more likely to identify as LGBTIQA+ than the general population, with some studies suggesting the number is as high as 40%.

With such a strong overlap between communities, it’s disappointing to say the least that Love on the Spectrum has featured more openly Christian participants than queer ones. 

Related content:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by journey early (@journeyearly)

The highlights 

Unlike the U.S. adaptation, the Australian Love on the Spectrum depicts a sapphic date between Chloe, who is bisexual, and Lotus early in its first season. After Chloe’s awkward first date of the series, with Marcus, she finds a spark with Lotus. 

“No one made me feel the same way as she did before,” Chloe said of Lotus. 

In the U.S. adaptation, bubbly 18-year-old Journey is the first openly queer participant and the first lesbian in any version of the show, appearing in season two.

She goes on three dates with two different women, and though neither leads to a long-term connection, we get to see an interesting discussion about queer relationships and gender roles when Journey’s date pulls out her chair for her at a restaurant. 

In season three, bisexual woman and train enthusiast Pari is set up with Tina Zhu Xi Caruso. Their relationship became the U.S. show’s most prominent queer storyline, with the pair forming a romantic connection that became widely beloved by fans. Unfortunately their relationship ended in April of 2026, however the two remain friends. 

The problems

In the two seasons of the U.S. Love on the Spectrum where queer dates have been featured, the only LGBTIQA+ cast members were always the last to be introduced. Both Journey and Pari only appeared in the second half of their respective seasons. 

Fans were also disappointed by the partners Journey was set up with, as she didn’t seem to have much in common with either, as well as the lack of screentime she was given. As both the only Black woman and the only lesbian on the show, it was disappointing to see Journey’s story used mainly as a B-plot while white, heterosexual participants were foregrounded. 

The prominence of heterosexual and Christian cast members in the show is particularly notable given that autistic people are more likely to identify as LGBTQ+ than the general population.

The gap between the statistics and the show has led some viewers to question whether the show’s cast adequately reflects the diversity of the autistic community. 

Hopefully the upcoming season 5 will depict more diverse cast members, with more of an emphasis on queer stories.

For the latest LGBTQIA+ Sister Girl and Brother Boy news, entertainment, and community stories in Australia, visit qnews.com.au. Find us on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube.

QNews, Brisbane Gay, App, Gay App, LGBTI, LGBTI News, Gay Australia

Get the best of what’s queer.

About The Author

1 thought on “How Love on the Spectrum fails to represent queer stories”

  1. “This lack of representation has drawn criticism from fans, who point out that individuals on the Autism spectrum are more likely to identify as LGBTIQA+ than the general population, with some studies suggesting the number is as high as 40%”.

    That is simply ridiculous. People with so-called autism have enough problems starting with the fact autism is ridiculously nebulous and nonsensical term that it is defined so broadly as to be meaningless.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *