Taylor Swift’s ‘Patient Zero’ and the queer history behind the term

Taylor Swift is using “patient zero” as a metaphor for being the ex who got there first. But the term itself emerged during the AIDS crisis, after a misunderstanding turned one gay man into the supposed source of an epidemic.

Taylor Swift’s Patient Zero got the full pop-cultural event treatment this week, with its music video premiering at the VMAs. It stars Colin Farrell alongside Dakota Johnson, patron saint of the exquisitely unimpressed woman (see: “Actually, no, that’s not the truth, Ellen”).

Swift released Patient Zero on September 25 as one of four new tracks on the expanded edition of The Life of a Showgirl, to what could generously be described as mixed reviews.

She has since explained that the song came from a conversation about a familiar phenomenon: when the new girlfriend of a terrible ex gets in touch with the old girlfriend to compare notes. Essentially: Oh, so he did that to you too.

In Swift’s metaphor, the first girlfriend becomes “patient zero”: the woman who got there first, experienced the symptoms first and can warn whoever comes next.

It’s a neat enough piece of wordplay. It also relies on a phrase with a considerably darker history.

In popular usage, “patient zero” has become shorthand for the person believed to sit at the beginning of an outbreak, the first case from which all the others supposedly follow.

But the phrase didn’t emerge from a hypothetical outbreak.

“Patient zero” as we understand it today can be traced to the early years of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, when a misunderstanding helped turn a gay Canadian flight attendant named Gaëtan Dugas into the man wrongly blamed for bringing HIV to the United States.

Before Patient Zero, there was Patient O

In the early 1980s, researchers at the US Centres for Disease Control were trying to make sense of a mysterious illness appearing among gay men.

Dugas, a French-Canadian flight attendant, had been diagnosed with Kaposi’s sarcoma in 1980, more than a year before the first official reports of the illness that would become known as AIDS. The rare cancer would soon become one of the conditions closely associated with the emerging AIDS epidemic..

When Dugas became part of the CDC’s investigation in 1982, researchers were mapping sexual connections between patients, looking for clues as to how the illness was spreading. There was no HIV test yet, and scientists had not established what was causing the illness.

Dugas proved unusually useful. He travelled extensively for work and was able to identify dozens of previous sexual partners, allowing investigators to connect cases across several US cities.

On the researchers’ charts, he was identified as “Patient O”.

The O stood for “Outside-of-California”, distinguishing Dugas from the California-based cases in the cluster. Somewhere between the charts, conversations and subsequent retellings, the O became a zero.

“Patient O” became “Patient 0”, and suddenly an administrative label appeared to tell a much more compelling story: here was the man at the beginning of it all. Researchers have since traced how that misunderstanding helped create the “Patient Zero” myth.

The making of an AIDS villain

By the mid-1980s, AIDS was killing thousands of people in the United States, the federal response had been painfully slow, and gay men were living through both an epidemic and the moral panic surrounding it.

Against that backdrop, the idea of a “Patient Zero” had obvious power. An unimaginably complex public-health crisis could be reduced to a single person, with a name and a face.

Dugas died in 1984, aged just 31.

He experienced the stigma surrounding AIDS while he was alive. Historian Richard A. McKay has documented the hostility Dugas encountered as his illness became visible, and friends recalled harassment in Vancouver and the fear among some gay men that simply being associated with him could damage their reputations.

But Dugas did not live to see himself transformed into the infamous “Patient Zero”. That happened after his death.

Three years later, journalist Randy Shilts published And the Band Played On, his landmark account of the AIDS crisis and the political and institutional failures that allowed it to become so devastating.

The book remains an enormously significant work of AIDS journalism. But its portrayal of Dugas would prove very consequential.

Dugas appeared in the book by name, portrayed as handsome, sexually prolific and reckless, a flight attendant who continued having sex despite warnings about the emerging illness.

That characterisation has since been complicated by historians, who have pointed to the uncertainty surrounding AIDS transmission at the time and the sometimes contradictory advice being given to gay men. Dugas is recorded to have cooperated extensively with public-health investigators.

McKay’s later research has examined how a helpful participant in an epidemiological investigation became its villain.

Dugas was living through an epidemic whose cause, and even exactly how it spread, was still being worked out, while simultaneously providing investigators with information that helped them understand it.

Then came the publicity surrounding Shilts’ book. “Patient Zero” proved an irresistible hook, and the media ran with it.

Later research found that “Patient Zero” became a deliberate focus of the book’s publicity strategy. 

Major publications had initially shown little interest in a book about AIDS and institutional failure. The idea of the “man who brought AIDS to America”, however, was considerably easier to sell.

And the resulting coverage was brutal. In October 1987, three years after Dugas had died, the New York Post ran the front-page headline “THE MAN WHO GAVE US AIDS”.

Other coverage similarly cast him as a foreign source of America’s AIDS epidemic.

Here, apparently, was AIDS’s origin story and its villain.

That story landed in a culture already primed to treat homosexuality as dangerous. Dugas was gay, sexually active and travelled for a living. The qualities that made him an especially useful contact for researchers also made him almost perfectly cast for the kind of morality tale being constructed around AIDS.

For years, his name would remain attached to the idea that one “promiscuous” gay man had brought HIV to America.

Science has since told us something very different.

So, was Gaëtan Dugas actually Patient Zero?

Put simply: no.

By the time Dugas entered the CDC’s investigation, HIV had already been circulating in the United States for years.

In 2016, researchers went back to some of the earliest known HIV samples and used genetic analysis to reconstruct the virus’s spread through North America. Their findings suggested HIV arrived in the United States via the Caribbean around 1970, with New York City becoming a crucial early hub before the virus spread across the country throughout the decade.

The first US cases of what would become known as AIDS weren’t reported until 1981.

The researchers were also able to analyse a blood sample taken from Dugas in 1983. His strain of HIV sat comfortably among others circulating at the time. They found neither biological nor historical evidence that he was the source of the US epidemic.

Dugas wasn’t the man who brought HIV to America. He was one of thousands of people who had contracted a virus that had been moving silently through communities for years.

In fact, Dugas was useful to researchers because he cooperated with them. His travel meant he could help connect cases in different cities, while his ability to remember previous partners gave investigators considerably more information than they could get from many other patients.

In helping researchers understand the epidemic, Dugas also became unusually visible within their map of it, and that visibility would eventually be mistaken for culpability.

The problem with ‘Patient Zero’

Dugas’s story also exposes a problem with the term itself.

Despite how neatly “patient zero” suggests a single starting point, outbreaks rarely offer one so conveniently.

The first person diagnosed with an illness is not necessarily the first person infected, nor is the first person noticed by health authorities necessarily the person who introduced a disease into a community.

An infection may have been circulating unnoticed for months or years before health authorities recognise it. Reducing that complicated chain of transmission to a single supposed starting point can be scientifically misleading. It also gives an outbreak a face, and that face can quickly become the villain.

“Where did this disease come from?” can very quickly become “Who brought it here?” Who infected whom? Who behaved badly? Who is responsible?

That becomes particularly dangerous when a disease is already bound up in stigma. During the AIDS crisis, gay men weren’t simply treated as people disproportionately affected by an emerging virus. Their sexuality and sexual behaviour were frequently folded into explanations for the epidemic itself.

That’s why “patient zero” remains a loaded phrase. It can turn the messy reality of how disease spreads into a much simpler story about where it started, who caused it and who should be blamed.

And for queer people, that history isn’t incidental. The term as we understand it today emerged from one of the most devastating periods in queer history, when a misunderstanding helped turn a gay man into the supposed source of an epidemic and reinforced the stigma already surrounding gay men and HIV/AIDS.

So, should Taylor Swift be using the term?

Four decades of repetition have largely detached the expression from Dugas and from the AIDS crisis that produced it.

But Swift’s decision to make Patient Zero the title and central metaphor of a major pop release has prompted criticism from some queer listeners, who have questioned whether an artist known for deliberate wordplay, double meanings and meticulously constructed references might reasonably be expected to interrogate the history of a phrase before building a song around it.

That criticism has been visible on social media since the song’s release. 

Under one widely shared explainer about Dugas and the term’s origins, some commenters questioned Swift’s choice of title. One asked whether a lyricist who ‘literally works in double meanings’ would not research the phrase.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Nick Wolny (@nickwolny)

But the reaction isn’t unanimous. Other commenters have argued that the criticism is a reach, while some have defended Shilts and the enormous importance of And the Band Played On, even as later scholarship has challenged its portrayal of Dugas.

We don’t know whether Swift knew the phrase’s history when she chose it. For some of her critics, that uncertainty is itself part of the issue. Others clearly see a common expression being used in its now-common meaning.

Either way, the debate illustrates just how far “patient zero” has travelled from its origins.

A phrase born from the scapegoating of a gay man during one of the most devastating periods in queer history can now appear in a pop song, understood by millions of people who may have never heard the name Gaëtan Dugas.

‘Patient zero’ outlived Patient Zero

Dugas has long since been cleared of the role history assigned him. The phrase attached to him has been considerably harder to shake.

“Patient zero” entered the language of outbreaks and stayed there, resurfacing through SARS, Ebola and, most recently, COVID-19. Somewhere along the way it slipped its medical moorings altogether, becoming shorthand for the person, place or thing where something began.

Four decades later, Taylor Swift can use it to describe two women discovering they’ve been poisoned by the same man and trust that we’ll understand exactly what she means.

The distance between the two stories is enormous: from an epidemiological diagram drawn during the earliest years of AIDS to Dakota Johnson looking immaculate in a gothic Taylor Swift video.

The path between them starts with an O, mistaken for a zero.

Gaëtan Dugas spent decades remembered as the man who started an epidemic he did not start. And his name has largely disappeared from popular memory, but the mistake attached to it certainly hasn’t.

For the latest LGBTIQA+ Sister Girl and Brother Boy news, entertainment, and community stories in Australia, visit qnews.com.au. Find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.