REVIEW: Martin Scorcese’s ‘Silence’ A Challenging Slog


Martin Scorcese's 'Silence'

At over two and a half hours, Martin Scorsese’s latest opus ‘Silence’ is a punishing film to endure.

Though the director has delivered longer in his career (the three hour plus ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ for example), there’s a distinct lack of action presented in ‘Silence’ that it gives the film an air of endlessness that is likely to challenge even the most devout of Scorsese fans. But I sense that’s the point.

Advertisements

Foregoing any desire to deliver entertainment, Scorsese wants to challenge his audience and make them question what they have seen; perhaps even hate their viewing experience. As for just what he is presenting, ‘Silence’ focuses on two 17th century priests (Andrew Garfield and Adam Driver) who travel to Japan on a mission to find their former mentor (Liam Neeson), a priest who has denounced his own faith.

It’s a story ripe with possibilities, and with the amount of talent on board (both in front of and behind the camera) you’d be forgiven for assuming it would deliver, yet the final product frustrates the viewer into near-submission.

Whether or not you deem ‘Silence’ a good film rests solely on the individual experience that is this film. It can’t be denied that it’s well made, but impressive statistics don’t necessarily equate to enjoyment. What one person can’t tolerate may stir another’s mind into reflection, and it’s through that distinct reaction that ‘Silence’ exists.

Silence is in cinemas tomorrow. Watch the trailer below:

 

For the latest lesbiangaybisexualtransgenderintersex and queer (LGBTIQ) news in Australia, visit qnews.com.au. Check out our latest magazines or find us on FacebookTwitterInstagram and YouTube.